Target Audience Clarification.

After proceeding to visual sketches it felt more natural to tackle this as an awareness project, but with a twist. I don't intend to do this for a charitable cause but instead in respect of it's economic and financial effect. This will be aimed at first world nations and to do with first world nations, the most prevalent being the United States, alot of information seemed to crop up when doing broader research that was specific towards our more confident cousins.

The thought crossed my mind to work within the confines of a magazine, the economist being an obvious choice as it's accesible to my target audience, works primarily with the communication of information and is on the whole plain enough to give me some room to play. Maybe a special issue or a supplement?

The Economist:













  

Visual Communications. Public.








Visually Research Target. Existing Outcomes.



Existing outcomes tend to focus on ways of making text harder to read or maps indicating areas with high or low illiteracy levels. Both of which I personally find a little drab though there is something aesthetically pleasing about map and cartography.

The audience is aimed at literate adults who live in developed nations and may have money in order to support those less fortunate. Presumably hoping for donations towards building educational institutes in poverty stricken areas.

It makes it more clear to me that I need to specify my target audience further. The obvious choice is the literate adults already stated. The question is do I want to contribute another 'obvious' illiteracy campaign? Another avenue would be to aim at illiterate people using pictograms. This would be tricky to say the least without vocal support.

Maybe my best bet is to start sketching visually as I have my general theme and see what comes out. Hopefully this will help me to inform my choices.

Reading.

One fact people found interesting in my presentation to my blog group was that 'one out of every eight letters you read is the letter 'e'. This gave me the idea to expand my research into reading, how we do it and the science behind it.


  • The average reader only reads 150 words per minute (wpm).
  • Only 5% of readers read more than 400 wpm.
  • Most of us can only assimilate what we hear when it is presented at 250 wpm.
  • Most of us can assimilate what we see at 2,000 to 10,000 wpm.
  • 4% to 11% of the text you read carries 80% of the meaning.

Average Books Read Per Year UK.


Science of Reading:

We read not every letter but more like an overview of words according to word shape. The psychoanalist James Cattell presented subjects with letter and word stimuli in extremely short bursts and found subjects had an easier time recognising the words than the letters they were shown. It is also believed that letters when shown in words are easier to read than not, for example D is easier to decipher when shown as WORD instead of OWRD.  

  
Another argument is that people find lowercase easier to read than upper, when presented with lowercase we read 5-10% faster. This supports the argument for word shape recognition due to lower case allowing the ascenders and descenders to give words more unique characteristics.

Interestingly when asked to proofread text for errors, if the error is more consistent with the actual word shape it is harder to detect.
Target word: test
Error rate
Consistent word shape (tesf)
13%
Inconsistent word shape (tesc)
7%

We also struggle to read alternating text due to its sporadic shape. 

alternating.      AlTeRnAtInG.

However there are alternative theories of how the brain truly reads, this is just the most supported and possibly most crucial to my studies because this is the main conclusion supported by typographers. 

Visual Communication of Collected and Categorised Information and Data.




I've always had a soft spot for info-graphics. There's something about a collection of quantitative data presented in such a clear and aesthetically interesting way that just does it for me. Charts, graphs and scales tend to play a leading role but thats not to say this is the only way to present my data.

Looking at publications and books might lead to more interesting possibilities of format but it's always good to get some inspiration.

Typogateux. Previous Submissions.

Thought it might be suitable for me to start my journey into the joys of edible type by looking at what previous years have submitted. Firstly to make sure I don't submit a cliche and secondly to gain some insight into what it's all about.



It's interesting seeing what previous students came up with. I especially like the type set with a mould just for it's crisp edges. The risk with cutting cake seems to be that it can look a bit messy. Perhaps something with chocolate? That way it would be easier for me to get it from Doncaster to college without it becoming an absolute mess. The only issue I might face would be it melting on the train, however I could probably surround it with frozen peas.

Context Of Practice Task 3.

  1. Aesthetic Apparatus. http://aestheticapparatus.com/
  2. McBess. http://mcbess.com/
  3. Kid Acne. http://www.kidacne.com/blog/
  4. Faile. http://www.faile.net/
  5. Dan Stiles. http://www.danstiles.com/
  6. Alphonse Mucha. 
  7. Joseph Muller Brockmann.
  8. Eric Gill.
  9. Milton Glaser.
  10. Paul Rand. http://www.paul-rand.com/
  11. Henri Matisse. 
  12. Andy Warhol.
  13. Poster Roast. http://posterroast.com/site/
  14. Aleksandr Rodchenko. 
  15. Jan Tschichold.
  16. Peter Saville.
  17. Glennz. http://store.glennz.com/
To Be Continued ...
 

Copyright 2010. All rights reserved.

RSS Feed. This blog is proudly powered by Blogger and uses Modern Clix, a theme by Rodrigo Galindez. Modern Clix blogger template by Introblogger.